As you know, this project came from a previous module, and so I have a fair amount of branding already done. Still, I think it’s good to test out a few things to make sure I can make the best out of it.
I am using the typefaces Archia (san serif) and Calendas (serif) from the Atipo Foundry – I like pairing the typefaces from the same foundry as it gives a more cohesive feel. Both have a few difference styles in the font families, but not so many to be overwhelming. Calendas Plus is a serif font with a pleasing stroke contrast and is suitable for long stretches of text. It also has some interesting discretionary ligatures as extra glyphs (see the as and us below) that give it a special feel without being too distracting for the reader.
Archia has a modern geometric feel that contrasts to the traditional feel of Calendas. The ‘a’ is single story, like Calendas, and some letters like the lowercase ‘l’ have slab serifs to make reading easier. The descender of the ‘g’ has a flattened base, and the ampersand has a flattened top loop, which gives it some distinction. It can be used for very heavy text, for captions in small sizes, or in lightweight spaced capitals for headings.
I’ve checked the licenses for these typefaces and I can use them for what I want. I have bought them.
“this font family can be used for personal and commercial works. you can use this font at a single home or business location on a maximum of five (5) cpus.
- you can do any kind of design work with this font family, including logo/trademarks design.
- the font may be used in editable embedding pdfs and other similar documents.
- the font may be used in e-publications.
- this font family can be embed into one (1) website (unlimited pageviews) so that it can be displayed on any browser.”
The logotype uses a scribbled graphic style that is used to sketch out how a typeface might look in the first stages:
I wanted to experiment with the thickness and density of the scribbles making up the letters, so used different pens, pencils, crayon and charcoal with varying strokes to achieve this. Here are my experiments and notation about what worked and what didn’t.
I also found that I like the ‘e’ tilted so that the crossbar is pointing upwards rather than horizontal.
I do really like the current logo because Stowe has a pleasing weight and neatness that I didn’t achieve in the new experiments whilst still retaining a craftiness. I don’t like writing the Framework underneath – I’d rather have it typed – because it provides contrast and looks more polished.